Leaders must weigh issues carefully

by Jeff Quibell 14. May 2009 09:48

DSC04450Residents on the west side of Blue Springs have long been asking when the city would pay more attention to Woods Chapel Road and the west side of Blue Springs. Hopefully, they may soon get their answer.

The City Council is to hold a May 18 hearing for the “Petition to Establish the Oaks at Woods Chapel Community Improvement District,” and many are eager to see the details of the proposal.  Seeing the item is on the agenda is an indication that the Oaks at Woods Chapel project is again trying to move forward. With the road improvements recently approved by Blue Springs voters, there may soon be a lot of activity on the west side of town.

On the Adams Dairy Landing project, discussion in the press has centered on whether the city will provide backing for an early offering of a portion of the bonds for road improvements that have already been completed and paid for by RED Development. Councilman Ron Fowler recently wrote, “What this really comes down to is the developers profit vs. taxpayer risk.” The question under consideration has taxpayer risk on both sides of the equation. If the city takes action that allows the project to fail, there is a risk of blight created by a partially completed project at a major intersection and entrance to our city.

Councilman Fowler is correct to suggest that the council needs to carefully consider the risks to the taxpayer. This deserves meaningful council discussion and debate. Perhaps in the future we will see that debate, with each council member discussing the positive and negative aspects of the question and working together to find the best solution.

The TIF projects approved in recent years had many layers of protection built in to protect our taxpayers’ interests. One such protection deals with the profit that the developer may make in return for an investment. The TIF agreements protect our taxpayers by requiring the developer to share their profit with our city, should the project exceed the profit range detailed in the TIF agreement. Think about that for a moment. By working together with the developer and helping them succeed, the taxpayers may get a bonus by sharing in any extra profits. That certainly deserves consideration.

I encourage our leaders to carefully evaluate the details of the TIF agreement, have a meaningful discussion of the pros and cons, and then and only then make their final decision on backing the bonds.

Tags:

Adams Dairy Parkway | City Council | Development | Woods Chapel

Comments

5/14/2009 9:39:07 PM #

Pam James

"Hopefully, they may soon get their answer." This has gone on and on....  I'll believe it when the equipment shows up. What happened to the developer and the plans for retail space and a grocery store? The pavement on Woods Chapel is rediculous... the private and public areas are disgraceful... the whole area is an embarrassment to the city. I'm ready to take my taxes to another city.

Pam James United States

5/14/2009 10:13:52 PM #

Doug Shrout

Jeff, Your comment  "if the city takes action that allows the project to fail" seems a bit biased. I've not heard anyone say the project won't happen without $13 million bond assurance by the city. The issue is the city gets a cheaper rate of interest than RED. Is this just misinformation you're spreading or do you have proof this is DOA without more public investment? With the TIF, SuperTIF,  TDD, CID costs over the next 30 years the taxpayer will have over $200 million in this project that started out at $50 million. I do feel empathy for RED given they're in the same soup in Lees Summit and Arizona in a economy that's tanked but in my estimation the reason the city has a policy against financial backstop is if the economy does what it's done. They've already spent enough on the parkway to reserect a dead man. The only redemption to this whole mess is if it somehow works as a catalyst for the Innovation Center.

Doug Shrout United States

5/15/2009 2:34:58 AM #

jeffq

Dear Doug,

Actually if you go back and listen to the meeting you will see that Mr. Lowe did say without the city’s backing of the bond issuance that the project would stop.  The city built quite a bit of protection into the project to protect against the developer not following through on their commitments.  So far RED has met their commitments.  

I think if you look at what they are asking and the protections being built into the response to that request, that they deserve a fair hearing before any councilman makes up their mind.  Take note that the proposal is allocating sales tax dollars that are already committed in the TDD from retailers that are already in business with the one exception of Target.  Neither you or I can say for certain what will happen in the coming months or years except that history tells us the economy will turn around because of the normal economic cycles.

There is no question in my mind that Adams Dairy Landing is a catalyst for Innovation Park.  I believe this because I sat in meetings before I left office where the university told us it was a critical component for the selection of this site.

Doug, I know you have not been supportive of the use of TIF, but Adams Dairy Landing has made the positive changes on the parkway possible.  When you consider at build out that Innovation Park may generate 192 million in annual payroll in Blue Springs, not to mention the property tax generation from all the real estate, it puts the cost of the other projects into perspective.

I would think all of that would be worthy for the council to give consideration to before making their decision.

Thank you for making the comments on my website.  It generates good discussion in the community!

jeffq United States

5/15/2009 7:59:21 AM #

Tina

I hope and pray the the city council will let the petition pass for the Woods Chapel Corridor.  We have many out of town visitors that stop off at the Woods chapel Rd exit. What they are seeing is not impressive at all.  I have taken my grocery money to Independence and Lee's summit until I either can sell my home or until they decide that this side of Blue Springs is just as important as the other side and provide us with some of the amenities that are provided to the other residents....

Tina United States

5/15/2009 7:26:09 PM #

Doug Shrout

Jeff, I guess if they said that and they stand to get $13 million if you believe, it must be true. I find it hard to believe with Targets building up and he has all the leases on the remainder that the difference in interest rates the city gets vs RED is causing the project to hang in the balance. It's just not credible at face value, those guy at RED aren't that myopic.

Doug Shrout United States

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.6.1.0 - Old School Theme by n3o Web Designers

About Jeff Quibell

Jeff QuibellJeff Quibell is a Blue Springs resident since 1984, former City Councilman, and local business owner.  He is dedicated to improving our city and helping keep our residents informed.  You can learn more about Jeff at his personal website http://www.jeffreyquibell.com/.

 There is a cost to advertising and maintaining this website.  Please consider making a small ($5 or $10) donation to help keep AboutBlueSprings.com operating by clicking the link below.  Your help is very much appreciated! 

 


 

RecentComments

Comment RSS

Calendar

<<  July 2010  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

View posts in large calendar